I have been teaching chess in rural areas around Udaipur for a while now. Between two villages I have regular 22 students. Most of these kids like chess although some did enlist in my chess classes more out of curiosity or simply to avoid other studies. I have made chess a privileged game within Badgao and Havala communities.
My first couple weeks of teaching was a complete disaster. Nobody listened. Classes were big. Kids were simply unmanageable. They could not understand most of what I was teaching. As the time went by I realized many common things going on between two of my village classes.
When I finally "hit the wall" with teaching chess I realized I would need help of someone who is a Hindi speaker as well as a great and patient teacher. I turned to Samvit, the founder of DAAN schools. Sam immediately took over my chaotically disorganized chess classes and started putting things in order. He took the same concepts I was trying to teach for days and presented it in a very efficient clear manner. I learnt a lot from him. He is also great at disciplining kids. With Sam's help things started to get better.
When chess classes in Badgaon center have become more or less organized and kids started making progress Sam insisted that we start the same activities in Havala educational center. At first I was dreading same crazy chaotic experience but then after what Sam did in Badgao center I thought it would be okay. Havala kids were surprisingly different from Badgao children. They were sharper and faster at learning. Also the group we selected for chess was a lot smaller and more manageable. We didn't have second demonstration board so we have to start each lesson by sitting in a circle and looking at one board.
With time I made everybody talk through each move and understand why we are agreeing on that move.
After a while I established the same routine at Havala as at Badgao. 10 min of repetition of previous lecture, 10 min of new lecture and a lot of time for "insane" gaming.
More and more kids started getting interested in chess in both villages. Senior children at Havala would sit every day and wait for their chess class impatiently at front of the school. Some started asking me whether they can take chess sets home and practice there. I had to say no. We would never see these sets again if this was to happen I bet.
I noticed more and more girls started taking interest in chess in Havala village while more boys were interested in chess in Badgaon village.
Badgaon center still remains my main focus. I now have four outstanding students. Surprisingly 3 of them belong to the same family. Girl name Preity, her brother Ashish, her cousin Uttam and one boy from rocky hills settlement - Pushkar. Pushkar and his family (total of 5) live in shanty Badgaon hill village in a house made of mud and paper. They are extremely poor but all kids seem to have very good values and extremely humble. His younger 6-year old brother Karan is now showing a very vivid interest in chess practically begging me to teach him. He watches his brother Pushkar play with Ashish and feels left out.
On the picture below you can see my four favorite students on whom I have started to focus individually. All love chess and come to the educational village center mainly to learn how to play in addition to simple English and math classes.
Preity is playing with her cousin Uttam. Boy next to me is Pushkar playing Ashish.
Ashish has become my personal "shadow". I think I am his favorite teacher. I think he only started taking interest in chess because I like it. I wonder what would he say if I have a change of heart from chess to checkers. Would he immediately quit it too and switch to checkers? ;)
Ashish cannot stand to see his sister Preity lose, so most of the time he plays both boards. One for him and one for Preity. On the picture below Ashish is consulting his cousin Uttam on how to make a bad move so that Preity wins :)
What I have learnt from my extremely unusual experience teaching chess in rural Rajasthani villages? A ton of things. I would divide it all into two categories: how to organize and how to teach.
In terms of organizational stuff;
1) it's important to maintain discipline
If discipline is not maintained the class would drive you crazy. You would have 10-14 screaming children all at once and all for various reasons. You would get one big painful headache and most likely nothing will be taught or learnt. Discipline involves sitting straight, listening, raising hands to answer etc.
2) it's important to maintain a routine
Routine should be something like 10 min beginning of each class to revise what they learnt before. I would revise name of each piece (example: white rook, black pawn etc), how pieces move, what is check, what is the purpose of chess etc. Another 10 min should be spent on new material. Could be learning how to castle, how not to move the king into check, good squares and dangerous squares. Also could be spent on teaching to work with just 2-4 pieces. For example, king against king and queen.
3) it's very important to focus on few students
I noticed it's a huge hassle trying to focus on large group of kids. Nobody really can learn anything. Kids distract each other by talking. Also it gets very hectic to the point where you simply feel torn apart between bunch of screaming kids. Every board wants attention. Teaching two boards at a time proved more effective although it does have side effects. Other kids feel left out etc.
In terms of teaching rules of chess I encountered some major obstacles:
1) kids forget which pieces are theirs and start moving opponent's pawns for example
2) it was hard for them to remember that pawn takes diagonally but marches straight. They thought it can march diagonally as well
3) kids did not understand why you cannot kill the king
4) kids did not understand that the check should to be addressed. Instead after one says "check" the other moves some other piece not-related to the check
5) kids moved knight to the wrong square
6) they would forget the difference between king and queen and start moving king many squares instead of one
7) they would always move into the check
8) they did not understand the concept of stalemate
9) they would forget that pieces other than knight cannot jump over other
pieces
10) They would very often move pawn to the left and right instead of straight. Sometimes even one square back.
In spite of what seemed to be an impossible task things started slowly to get better. Kids started getting used to seeing the same things over and over again. They started to become cautious. They still have many rules to learn (en passant, how to castle correctly, stalemate etc) but I know they will do fine. For a long time I thought I will not be able to teach them anything at all but now looking at Vivek from Havala village or Ashish from Badgao I know I can! Just takes a lot of time, that's all.
Tomorrow I will visit an old Indian master who teaches chess to advanced FIDE rated kids in Udaipur. I will ask him for some help. Perhaps one of his students could visit at least one of our centers occasionally to continue teaching the kids. Not sure if this is possible. But I should ask anyways.
My chess task is accomplished. I have presented the game of chess into the rural communities as the game of privilege requiring patience, good memory and intelligence. Not sure where it's going to go from there as I am leaving the country very soon. I hope they will remember me wherever the life takes them especially if one day they will play chess somewhere when they are older.